Posted by
Cole West on Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:11:49 AM
Reading the M. Maulkin post regarding the recent DHS warnings of the enemies of state, made me think Ms. Maulkin must be in the top ten of this DHS most unwanted list. The FBI may have already begun an intensive study of all her blogs, emails, and recent phone conversations. Don't laugh. She fits the profile to a "t." If the DHS document does not generate an FBI field report on her, or some type of monitoring effort, then who, pray tell, are they monitoring? I am perfectly serious.
Somone might respond that the FBI is only actively monitoring the "nut jobs," those who have a real propensity to violence. Perhaps. But that is not what the DHS report says, is it? And if they are not monitoring Ms. Maulkin, I would argue that they are not doing their job, and may be subject to supervisory repreimand. After all, the department must follow up on the guidelines imposed from above. The guidelines from DHS clearly identify the character traits to target. And the target has Ms. Maulkin squarely in the crosshairs. If I were her, I would have my dwelling checked for surveillance devices. I would check my phone and computer for tracking devices. And I would look to see if my mail were tampered with.
Now you are calling me a nut. You think this is hyperbole to make a point. Yuo still don't get it then. I am deadly serious. If Ms. Maulkin is not a target, please explain to me why not?
Regarding the DHS report Ms. Maulkin spoke about, her conclusion is spot on. The enemies of state, in the eyes of our present government, are all of those who disagree with the federal government, both actively and inactively! By actively, I mean in word, in print, and in any form of communication. By inactively, I mean in thought as well.
Moreover, I am not ready to label this government position a wholly owned subsudiary of the new Democratic administration. We might be quite surprised at the aquiescence, and support it receives among many republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill. The reaction, or should I say, lack of reaction, to the DHS report on the Hill might provide the proof in the pudding. I might be correct in saying that this is a Central Government, or "Federal" mentality that crosses the party aisle.
The Federal Government is presently fearful of citizen dissent. Ms. Maulkin, you have been duly-warned.